Of course, the only (legit) way to make your following grow is to make it worth it: post great updates people would love to follow. Naturally, this takes time and effort and not everyone has the patience to do it the right way.
Hence the popularity of other (“spammy”) methods to make your following number grow, and here I am listing the 3 of them.
Don’t get me wrong I am not going to tell you why it is unethical or bad to use them: who am I to educate you? (Besides, I have played with all of them just for the sake of an experiment, so I am kind of guilty myself.)
This post is why those tactics are ineffective and even dangerous, but it’s for you to decide is you want to use them or not.
They work the following way:
Why is this ineffective?
The communities just make no point to me. All you are getting is a number, none of those so-called “followers” ever actually follow you: and you end up being heard by no one having thousands of followers. What’s the point?
This works the following way:
Why is this ineffective?
Except for often being irrelevant, this is good way to get your account suspended for exceeding the following limit.
This works as follows:
Why is this ineffective?
It just doesn’t work! No one ever clicks and even if someone does, no one follows. Look at the diagram I got for buying 1000 impressions there (the green line represents those who clicked):
It’s all comes to where we have started: Twitter math is NOT simple and it’s NOT about the numbers. Actually, it is NOT about math. The main thing is if you are really followed or not. 100 “real” dedicated followers who added you for merit are worth thousands!
Post image by Abulic Monkey
View Comments
Thanks for this nice article. I was thinking of using a similar method, but dropped the idea because i understood it won't help me in any way. Even without doing anyhting, I get a lot of bogus followers (who get benefitted when i click on their link - to check their website details)
#3 really applies to all banner ads in general. paying for impressions is like paying for richard nixon impressions. they are worthless.
I agree that Twitter success is not measured by raw numbers but more by how effectively you network and interact with others.
Is leaving comments on articles about twitter with your twitter profile a good idea? :)
Thanks for good information. but I don't think it is useful. Twitter success is not depend on to add more no of followers but its depend to add profitable followers. Now a days twitter is one of the best social media to promote your business on internet.
Great article summed up very well in the last sentence: '100 "real" dedicated followers who added you for merit are worth thousands! '
Glad I found your blog!
For some reason, I am appalled at the concept of paying for a service that claims it can *make* people follow my twitter.
I agree that banner advertising is pretty much one of the least effective internet marketing strategies in general, but twitter account banner advertising?? My lord, what a joke!
I get many accounts following me on a daily basis - I'll always follow the ones that have interesting non-spammy tweets relevant to my interests.
Good article.
@Phil, you tell us :)
Regarding #3. Do you think it would make a difference if instead of being CPM it was CPC? Or even if it was cost per new follower? It seems like your beef is with the price vs performance. If the scale was tipped, or the performance was increased, or both, would you still take issue?